Oyster HR vs Skuad
Oyster HR and Skuad simplify complex global employment, but they follow different paths. Oyster HR focuses on comprehensive support, trust, and speed for full-time EOR hires. Skuad offers highly affordable contractor management but users report administrative billing risks. Choosing correctly depends on whether you prioritize financial reliability or the lowest starting contractor cost.
Global EOR and payroll made simple.
We find Oyster HR to be a powerful, centralized solution for managing distributed teams globally, backed by strong client satisfaction. It offers competitive EOR services and essential contractor management tools to ensure full compliance worldwide. Overall, we recommend Oyster highly for companies needing fast, compliant global scaling with excellent support.
Pros
- Exceptionally quick and smooth employee onboarding processes (as fast as 48 hours).
- Comprehensive Employer of Record (EOR) service available in 120+ countries.
- The platform interface is consistently described as user-friendly and streamlined.
- Highly responsive and polite customer support team, often handling queries quickly.
Cons
- The EOR plan is high-priced at $699 per employee/month.
- Some users experience delays in support response times due to global time zone differences.
- Benefits packages for lower-tier employees have received negative feedback.
- Clients need time to adapt to the required 'prefund' invoicing system.
Effective Global Payroll, Invoicing Needs Polish
We note that Skuad (now Payoneer WFM) offers robust tools for hiring and managing global contractors and full-time employees, complete with local compliance and multi-currency payroll. We appreciate the clear pricing structure and the inclusion of necessary tax management support for EOR services. Overall, the platform shows strong potential but must immediately improve diligence regarding billing accuracy and prompt resolution of the serious administrative problems highlighted by corporate users.
Pros
- Easiest platform for paying and managing international contractors.
- Reliably timely salary payments reported by employees.
- Supports hiring full-time employees and contractors globally.
- Strong focus on local compliance and localized contracts.
Cons
- Significant issues reported regarding invoice accuracy and justification.
- Support response times can be extremely slow, sometimes taking weeks.
- Lack of detailed data for verifying expenses like benefits and social security.
- Historical reports of failure to remit income tax payments in certain countries.
AboutOyster HR
Oyster is an all-in-one trusted platform for global employment. It helps you build distributed teams worldwide efficiently and ethically. The platform offers essential Employer of Record (EOR) services and consolidated multi-country payroll management. Oyster helps you hire full-time staff and contractors compliantly across the globe. You also get supportive employment experts offering guidance every step of the way. 💡
AboutSkuad
Skuad has successfully transitioned and is now known as Payoneer Workforce Management (WFM). This service focuses entirely on simplifying global employment for businesses of any size. It provides world class support and tools to manage your workforce from onboarding through daily operations. 💡
Highlights
Feature Comparison
Features Overview
We highlight the main differences and pick a winner for each feature.
EOR Onboarding Speed
Skuad advertises the quickest onboarding time for new global hires.
Skuad claims the ability to hire and onboard a full-time EOR candidate in under 24 hours. Oyster HR also promises blazing speed, onboarding talent as quickly as 48 hours globally. For rapid, immediate placement, Skuad holds the edge in advertised speed. This speed is vital for securing competitive global talent faster.
Cost of Entry
Skuad is significantly cheaper for managing independent contractors.
Skuad starts at just $19 per contractor per month for essential services. Oyster HR's starting Contractor plan is higher at $29 per month. For businesses focusing on contractor volume, Skuad offers better initial budgetary savings. The EOR pricing is also lower to start with Skuad ($199 vs. $699 for Oyster HR).
Financial Reliability
Oyster HR offers much higher demonstrated financial diligence and trust.
Oyster HR users consistently praise its streamlined platform and process clarity. Skuad has faced serious user allegations regarding unjustified charges and invoice inaccuracies. There are also reports of Skuad failing to remit income taxes in specific regions for months. Oyster HR offers greater peace of mind for finance teams mitigating global risk.
Customer Support Quality
Oyster HR receives much better user feedback concerning support responsiveness.
Oyster HR reviews frequently highlight the support team as highly polite, patient, and quick to respond. Skuad users report painful delays, sometimes waiting weeks for serious administrative issues to resolve. Skuad's support improves only when issues are formally escalated to senior staff. If reliable, quick support is a must, Oyster HR is the clear preference.
Trial Access & Fees
Oyster HR provides a risk-free trial; Skuad requires a commitment.
Oyster HR offers a free 30-day trial for its Contractor plan, allowing full platform testing. Skuad does not advertise any free trials or guarantees; users must request a demo. Oyster HR also clearly states they charge zero setup or cancellation fees. Skuad's lack of fee transparency increases the initial risk.
Currency Coverage
Oyster HR offers payments in double the number of global currencies.
Oyster HR supports payroll and invoices in an impressive 140+ currencies worldwide. Skuad covers essential payments and deductions in 70 currencies. If your global team is extremely diverse or uses niche currencies, Oyster HR provides essential flexibility. This wider access simplifies paying remote staff accurately and on time.
EOR Country Coverage
Skuad provides EOR services across a wider range of global markets.
Skuad manages workers and EOR processes in over 160 countries globally. Oyster HR focuses its full EOR service on 120+ countries. For companies expanding into specific, less-common markets, Skuad may provide the necessary coverage. Note that Oyster HR offers contractor compliance tools in 180+ countries.
Strategic Insight Tool
Skuad provides a specific tool for researching international market expansion.
Skuad promotes its Country Explorer feature for strategic market research. Oyster HR offers an Employment Cost Calculator to help plan global hiring budgets efficiently. The Explorer tool in Skuad is likely best for initial market assessment and legal insight. Oyster HR focuses on the critical budgetary side of new hires.
Our Verdict
Choosing between Oyster HR and Skuad means prioritizing trust versus up-front low cost. If reliability and customer backing matter most, Oyster HR is the superior platform. Skuad gives you the lowest initial price tag, but user feedback suggests this comes with administrative risk. Oyster HR’s superpower is delivering reliable service with exceptional speed and support. You can onboard full-time EOR employees compliantly in as fast as 48 hours. The platform receives wide praise for its user-friendly interface and highly speedy customer support. Oyster HR also handles global payroll in 140+ currencies, offering massive flexibility. Skuad shines primarily on cost savings and country coverage. The contractor management plan starts at a low $19 per month, which is very competitive. Skuad also claims the ability to onboard new EOR team members in less than 24 hours. Furthermore, Skuad covers EOR services in more countries, reaching 160+ markets. The deciding factor should be financial diligence and operational safety. Oyster HR is trusted by finance teams for its billing transparency and stability. Skuad faces repeated user complaints regarding billing errors and tax remittance failures, making it a higher financial risk. Access to a 30-day free trial from Oyster HR lowers your entry commitment. We confidently recommend Oyster HR for any company prioritizing stability and scalable global compliance. Only consider Skuad if you are small, contractor-focused, and willing to accept the reported administrative headaches for greater savings.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which tool is faster for EOR onboarding: Oyster HR or Skuad?
Skuad advertises the ability to onboard a new EOR employee in less than 24 hours. Oyster HR also offers fast service, promising completion in as fast as 48 hours. Skuad technically claims the quicker turnaround time for full-time hires.
Which platform supports more global payment currencies?
Oyster HR offers a far wider reach by supporting payroll and invoices in 140+ currencies. Skuad handles payments and deductions in only 70 currencies globally. For diverse international teams, Oyster HR provides essential flexibility.
Does Skuad have transparency issues compared to Oyster HR pricing?
Oyster HR is very transparent, advertising no setup or cancellation fees for users. Skuad does not explicitly publish its policy on setup costs or cancellation terms. Oyster HR is clearer about your total financial commitment.
Which is better for small teams focused only on contractors?
Skuad is more cost-effective for contractor-only needs, starting at just $19 per month. Oyster HR starts its comparable contractor plan at $29 per seat monthly. Skuad offers the financial advantage for basic contractor scaling.
Does Oyster HR offer a free trial, unlike Skuad?
Yes, Oyster HR eases commitment risk by offering a 30-day free trial on its Contractor plan. Skuad does not advertise a free trial or guarantee; you must request a demo to proceed.
How do Oyster HR and Skuad compare on customer feedback?
Oyster HR holds a strong 4.5/5 rating, showing high user satisfaction with quality support. Skuad's lower 3.6 rating reflects user concern over slow support and serious invoicing inaccuracies. Reliability strongly favors Oyster HR.
Ready to Choose?
Both tools have their strengths. Choose based on your specific needs.