Close CRM vs Keap
People often struggle choosing between Close CRM and Keap for scaling small teams. Close CRM is a sales-first platform focused purely on execution speed and centralized comms. Keap is a deep automation engine designed specifically for comprehensive lead capture and growth. The choice depends on whether efficiency or lead complexity is your top priority.
Pros
Cons
High price, high risk platform.
We found that Keap promises powerful automation for faster growth, but current user feedback indicates significant instability and high friction points in essential areas. Overall, the steep starting cost combined with serious, recurring complaints about billing practices and unresponsive client support make this platform a major risk.
Pros
- Robust core marketing and sales automation capabilities.
- Access to expert coaching and in-depth training resources.
- Includes detailed features for lead capture and nurturing.
- U.S.-based call-in support available during business hours.
Cons
- High starting price ($299/month) plus a mandatory, separate implementation fee.
- Unreliable core functionality, leading to mass opt-outs and automation failures.
- Billing practices are frequently reported as misleading, involving overcharging or hidden fees.
- Cancellation process is intentionally difficult, requiring multiple steps and often forcing extra payments.
AboutClose CRM
Close is a refreshingly direct CRM, specifically built for selling. Unlike systems that overload you with complex steps, this tool focuses on delivering results. It is designed to be your single hub, functioning as one comprehensive tool for all communication needs. Close works hard to help you better manage customers and effectively work your deals. 💡
AboutKeap
Keap helps businesses achieve powerful outcomes like faster growth. It focuses on important steps like generating more leads and securing an increase in revenue. Using Keap also results in putting more money directly in your pockets. It's a tool designed for business owners who want measurable results and professional success. 💡
This approach allows businesses to save time per week. By implementing automation, companies can dramatically increase how much work they get done. You can maximize efficiency using the existing team you already have.
Highlights
Feature Comparison
Features Overview
We highlight the main differences and pick a winner for each feature.
Core Platform Design
Close CRM streamlines internal selling workflows; Keap focuses on lead-to-revenue engines.
Close CRM is a singular, sales-first platform built specifically for managing deals and communication. It aims to cut chaos and busywork for high-speed sales teams. Close CRM helps simplify the tech stack by centralizing customer context. Keap is billed as an automation and growth platform for small businesses. Its primary goal is generating more leads and achieving predictable sales. Keap helps you run things smoothly with the team you already have. Keap focuses on the external automation needed for growth; Close CRM focuses on internal efficiency. If your pain point is complex funnels, choose Keap. If it’s slow sales execution and fragmented tools, choose Close CRM. Close CRM is ideal for teams exhausted by juggling emails, calls, and tasks in separate systems.
Advanced AI Support
Close CRM includes deep AI features; Keap relies on traditional automation only.
Close CRM is heavily invested in AI features that boost sales productivity. These include the AI Notetaker, AI Summaries, and the AI Email Rewrite Assistant. Close CRM enhances conversations by also integrating natively with Claude and ChatGPT. Keap focuses its power on marketing and sales sequencing through a traditional automation engine. The provided data does not mention specific AI assistants for notes, summaries, or content creation. Keap relies on automated personalization features instead of dynamic AI assistance. Close CRM gives your sales reps immediate, conversational support powered by AI. Keap offers powerful logic for lead movements, but without AI assistance for daily tasks. If AI is a priority, Close CRM is the clear winner. The AI tools in Close CRM solve the pain of manually documenting calls and updating email drafts quickly.
Automation & Cost
Close CRM lowers costs by reducing external tools; Keap offers more powerful sequence building.
Close CRM explicitly promises to help you cut your Zapier bill. It centralizes communication to ensure reliable data flows and reduce flaky handoffs. Built-in automations target simple, consistent workflows for sales execution. Keap boasts a 'powerful automation engine' designed for detailed lead capture and nurturing workflows. Keap is built to automate growth, scheduling timely follow-ups automatically. This automation depth ensures consistent engagement with leads. Close CRM aims to *simplify* automation and make it reliable within one tool. Keap aims to provide *deep, complex* sequences for personalized growth. The trade-off is simplification versus complexity and power. Teams spending too much time troubleshooting fragmented systems will find Close CRM's cost-saving simplification appealing.
Pricing Transparency
Close CRM has clear, low-cost tiers; Keap's pricing is opaque and widely criticized by users.
Close CRM offers clear pricing tiers, including a 'Solo' plan and starting at $0/year. Billing options include monthly or yearly subscriptions. This transparent plan structure helps teams budget effectively with known limits (e.g., Solo is 1 user/10k leads). Keap's exact plan prices are not explicitly stated in the public data available. Instead, user reviews cite pricing increases and perceived overcharging frequently. The opaque billing language has created significant customer trust issues. The user sentiment regarding Keap's pricing, cancellation, and support is extremely negative. Close CRM provides a free trial and clear paths to scale. Financial risk is much higher with Keap due to poor billing transparency. If budget planning and trust are key factors, Close CRM offers a far safer, more predictable approach.
Scalability & Reliability
Close CRM focuses on reliable internal data; Keap's reliability suffers based on user reports.
Close CRM centralizes customer context and deal history for fast onboarding of new reps. Its core aim is reliable, cleaner data flow across the team. Close CRM is SOC2 compliant and supports data import and export easily. Sadly, Keap user reviews repeatedly cite reliability concerns, including duplicate emails and auto opt-outs disrupting workflows. Users also mention persistent tag proliferation and data hygiene issues. Keap's powerful engine can be hampered by these reliability flaws. Close CRM is built to maximize the sales team’s efficiency and data trust in a centralized hub. Keap's automation power is undeniable, but it comes with known risks of unpredictable system behavior. For a smooth operation without constant support calls about broken email flows, Close CRM appears to be the safer bet.
Our Verdict
Choosing between Close CRM and Keap boils down to your primary business pain point. Close CRM is the straightforward choice for sales teams needing speed, clarity, and transparent pricing. Keap offers powerful, deep marketing automation but carries significant user risk. Close CRM’s superpower is making sales execution easier through simplification and AI. It centralizes all communication into one reliable tool, eliminating the complex, costly fragmentation of external services. The AI Notetaker and Summaries keep reps moving fast and focused on selling. Keap dominates when you need serious, comprehensive lead generation and nurturing sequences. Its powerful automation engine is built for small businesses focused solely on achieving predictable sales growth. Keap gives management confidence in future revenue streams. The deciding factor here is trust and financial transparency. Keap’s high number of user complaints about billing, rising costs, and cancellation difficulties are alarming. Close CRM offers clear, tiered pricing starting free, providing much needed budget predictability. Go with Close CRM if you need reliable operations, AI support, and zero billing surprises for your sales execution. Only commit to Keap if your growth engine absolutely requires its automation depth and you're prepared to navigate potential service and cost hurdles.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which offers better automation depth: Close CRM or Keap?
Keap offers a powerful automation engine specifically designed for complex marketing sequences. Close CRM focuses on built-in automations aimed at simplicity and centralizing workflows. If you need complex drip campaigns, Keap is stronger; if you need fewer tools and reliable data, choose Close CRM.
Is Close CRM more focused on sales or marketing than Keap?
Close CRM is explicitly a sales-first platform built for managing deals and closing activity. Keap is a growth platform targeting both marketing (lead generation) and sales predictability. Close CRM is better focused purely on the needs of the sales rep.
Does Close CRM include AI features like Keap?
Yes, Close CRM includes robust AI features like AI Notetaker, Summaries, and Email Rewrite Assistant. Close CRM also offers direct integration with Claude and ChatGPT. Keap's feature list does not highlight any comparable, dedicated AI tools.
Which tool is better for managing all my communication workflows?
Close CRM is designed as 'one tool for all communication' to reduce data handoffs and chaos. It aims to improve reliability by centralizing context for calls and emails. Keap’s reviews suggest reliability issues like duplicate emails, potentially disrupting communication flows.
Does Close CRM cost more to start than Keap?
No. Close CRM offers a transparent pricing structure starting with a free plan ($0/year Solo tier). Keap's exact prices are unstated, and users widely complain about increasing costs and unclear billing language.
Is Keap worth the extra cost over Close CRM for a small business?
Keap is worth it only if you require its specific, powerful depth in lead automation and personalized sequences. However, Close CRM reviewers cite lower overall costs by helping cut Zapier expenses. Keap's added complexity and cost often come with higher risk.
Ready to Choose?
Both tools have their strengths. Choose based on your specific needs.