Asana and Motion are powerful platforms enhanced by artificial intelligence. Asana is the classic choice for robust project management and enterprise scaling. Motion is a focused, expensive AI workforce that manages your time entirely. The choice is between structure (Asana) and automated high-efficiency optimization (Motion).
Great features, poor customer support.
We find that Asana offers powerful project management features, excellent organizational scalability, and a generous free plan suitable for small teams. However, recurring external reports indicate severe problems with customer service responsiveness and billing transparency, heavily detracting from the product’s core strengths. Overall, we recommend caution for small businesses or any organization prioritizing reliable, direct customer support.
AI scheduling that manages your work.
We observed that Motion delivers on its promise of powerful, AI-driven task management and scheduling. Users consistently report massive time savings and reduced cognitive load, but the complex credit and seat pricing structure requires careful study. Overall, Motion is a transformative tool for dedicated users who commit to mastering its full capabilities.
Asana is an online platform built specifically to manage your team’s work, projects, and tasks. It supports powerful Human + AI collaboration.
This AI component understands your specific business context, helping to move your most important work forward efficiently. Because it's a centralized ecosystem, it easily brings all doers and stakeholders together in one place. 💡
Motion transforms how teams work by offering the world's first AI workforce at your fingertips. ✨ This platform goes far beyond simple automation; it lets you create and deploy enterprise-grade AI Employees specifically built for your business needs. It merges an entire productivity suite—including AI Projects, AI Calendar, and AI Tasks—where all your work is managed and recorded. Motion is trusted by over a million top performers and teams who want a single, powerful platform for managing work efficiently.
We highlight the main differences and pick a winner for each feature.
Motion uses transformative AI employees; Asana's AI enhances standard PM workflows.
Asana utilizes its AI Studio to optimize existing processes and handle repetitive tasks. The Asana AI understands context to improve automation rules effectively. Motion's core focus is creating custom AI Employees using natural language instructions. Motion’s AI agents handle complex, end-to-end work across the entire integrated suite. Asana enhances human work with AI assistance. Motion aims to replace redundant human coordination with AI autonomy. Motion’s AI agents execute tasks and gather context across the platform for superior accuracy.
Asana is predictable and offers a great free plan; Motion is high-cost and usage-based.
Asana has a generous permanent free tier supporting up to 10 users. Paid Asana plans scale with clean, flat per-user license fees annually or monthly. Motion requires a high entry cost starting at $29/month for one seat. Motion’s pricing also introduces usage-based monthly AI credits you must purchase. Asana offers cost predictability crucial for budgeting. Motion is only worth the cost if the AI provides massive efficiency gains. Motion requires annual payment for its standard tiers. Asana offers more flexible monthly payment options.
Motion has responsive support staff; Asana’s support is widely reported as abysmal.
Asana’s customer service is frequently cited as slow, absent, or relying on chatbots. Only Asana’s highest Enterprise tier receives dedicated 24/7 support availability. Motion receives positive user reports regarding staff responsiveness, especially for billing issues. Higher Motion plans like AI Employees Plus receive dedicated Priority Business Support. User reviews heavily penalize Asana for poor service and unfriendly billing. Motion successfully handles basic support functions crucial for daily operations.
Asana offers detailed views and structure; Motion focuses on automated task flow.
Asana provides classic project management with unlimited tasks and projects. Users gain access to essential views like Timeline and Gantt charts. Motion merges Projects, Calendar, and Docs into one highly automated suite. Motion’s AI Project module automatically generates plans and manages status tracking. Asana is crucial for visualizing complex dependencies via traditional Gantt charts. Motion’s approach removes the administrative burden entirely for the project manager.
Motion is fully autonomous; Asana requires full manual resource management.
Asana requires project managers to manually prioritize tasks and schedules. Asana's automation rules handle routine actions, not timing adjustments. Motion automatically creates, assigns, and prioritizes work instantly. Motion rebalances tasks when deadlines or schedules unexpectedly shift. Motion eliminates the constant time wasted on rescheduling tasks. This is the single biggest time-saver reported by Motion users. Asana is better for teams who prefer to maintain rigid, manual control over their calendar.
Asana is proven for massive enterprises; Motion scales via custom AI contracts.
Asana is trusted by Fortune 100 companies and handles massive user bases effectively. Its Enterprise+ tiers support strict compliance like HIPAA and SIEM integration. Motion scales by requiring clients to purchase more seats and AI credits monthly. The Motion Enterprise tier offers engagement with dedicated Forward Deployed Engineers. Asana is better suited for organizations requiring deeply complex compliance and administrative controls. Motion focuses on scaling AI capacity rather than organizational visibility complexity.
Asana offers 300+ unlimited integrations; Motion limits connections per plan.
Asana connects with over 300 major and enterprise tools seamlessly. Its integration with Salesforce, Tableau, and Power BI is key for advanced tiers. Motion integrates with hundreds of tools to gather essential context. However, Motion quotas connections, limiting them to 3–50 depending on your plan. Asana provides a far wider, unlimited ecosystem for general connectivity needs. Motion uses integrations primarily to feed data context to its powerful AI agents.
Asana includes native resource visualization; Motion requires relying on capacity data.
Asana provides dedicated Resource Management starting with the Advanced plan. Users can visualize team staffing and check available capacity easily across the business. Motion’s capacity planning is driven by the AI balancing task loads. It does not offer the same high-level, human-driven resource visualization. Asana is essential if you need explicit tools to manage human workload and bandwidth. Motion aims to manage capacity automatically to prevent resource bottlenecks.
Choosing between Asana and Motion comes down to structure versus intense automation. If you need traditional project management, Asana is the proven veteran. If you desire pure autonomous scheduling, Motion is the expensive disruptor. For most large teams, the foundational structure of Asana will be more familiar and affordable. Asana excels at giving enterprise teams unparalleled control and deep visibility. Asana provides resource management, Gantt charts, and unlimited portfolio tracking. It's built for complexity and offers a generous free tier for up to 10 users. Asana is the safer bet for organizations requiring stringent regulatory compliance and reporting. Motion’s superpower is its intelligent, personalized AI workforce and auto-scheduling. Motion automatically creates, prioritizes, and rebalances all tasks across your schedule. This saves managers hours of manual coordination and dramatically reduces decision fatigue. Motion users call this AI automation transformative and life changing. Ultimately, the decider is budget versus administrative relief. Motion costs significantly more due to its usage-based pricing model. Asana offers better cost predictability and proven organizational scalability. Pick Motion if you are willing to spend more for AI efficiency. Choose Asana if you need core project reliability and a massive Fortune 100 ecosystem.
Asana offers a powerful, permanent free tier supporting up to 10 users easily. Motion has no free plan and starts at $29/month for only one seat. Asana is clearly the superior choice for small teams starting project management.
No, Asana focuses on human prioritization and manual project organization. Motion’s unique core strength is its powerful AI that prioritizes and adjusts your entire schedule automatically. This difference greatly impacts daily workflow.
Motion justifies its higher cost through transformative time savings and reduced administration. If your priority is eliminating manual scheduling and coordination, Motion is worth the premium. If you need budget compliance, Asana is a much cheaper solution.
Asana uses AI Studio primarily for enhancing automation and repetitive tasks. Motion lets you build custom AI Employees that perform end-to-end work via natural language instructions. Motion’s AI is integrated deeper into the entire productivity suite.
Reviews consistently show Motion users reporting successful and responsive support staff. Asana’s customer support is widely criticized as unresponsive and reliant on frustrating chatbots. Motion wins based on user experience.
Asana offers an extensive and unlimited ecosystem of over 300 integrations. Motion ties integrations to plan quotas, limiting the number of connections allowed per tier. Asana is better for complex, unlimited connectivity.
Both tools have their strengths. Choose based on your specific needs.