TeamTailor vs Workable
TeamTailor and Workable dominate the middle market Applicant Tracking System space. TeamTailor focuses on sleek usability and massive integration support for recruiters. Workable bundles a powerful ATS with a full HRIS for complete employee management. The critical difference is whether you need a dedicated ATS or a fully consolidated suite.
Intuitive ATS with exceptional support.
We find TeamTailor excels by blending advanced ATS features with a highly user-friendly interface that significantly boosts the candidate experience. Overall, we rate it highly due to its reliable performance and the consistent excellence of its customer service team.
Pros
- Extremely user-friendly and intuitive platform interface.
- Exceptional, fast, and personal customer support team and CSMs.
- Strong capabilities for creating a seamless and positive candidate experience.
- Includes useful automations and scheduling tools, which are efficient for lean teams.
Cons
- Initial system setup can be confusing for some new users.
- Lacks flexibility in customizing fundamental candidate interaction steps (e.g., post-application pages).
- The company's email domains have unfortunately been referenced in external job scams/phishing attempts.
Powerful Feature Stack, Inconsistent Experience
We assessed Workable as a powerful all-in-one platform successfully combining high-end ATS and HRIS functions with robust AI tools. Our analysis showed excellent pricing transparency and a strong feature set built for scalability, but user reports indicate notable inconsistencies in execution. Overall, we recommend Workable for companies prioritizing a comprehensive feature stack, provided they can work around the reported UI clunkiness and source tracking issues.
Pros
- Combines comprehensive Applicant Tracking System (ATS) and HRIS functionality.
- Uses powerful AI for sourcing, screening, and drafting interview materials.
- Customer support is frequently described as fast, effective, and helpful.
- Offers transparent, publicly displayed pricing tiers starting at $299/month.
Cons
- Candidate source tracking is often unreliable, requiring manual and time-consuming updates.
- User interface is frequently described as clunky, buggy, and not intuitive.
- Initial integration and setup processes can be difficult or 'slightly fraught.'
- Functionality and wording are sometimes perceived as USA-centric.
AboutTeamTailor
Teamtailor is more than just software; it's a specialized way to handle modern recruitment. It functions as an all-in-one recruitment platform and Applicant Tracking System (ATS) 💡. This platform is designed to create a frictionless experience for both candidates and hiring teams. Teamtailor works for companies of all sizes, from growing startups and SMBs to large enterprises. It helps you optimize how you find, attract, and convert top talent successfully.
AboutWorkable
Workable serves as a truly comprehensive, future-ready HR platform designed for demanding businesses. It effectively combines sophisticated candidate sourcing and a full Applicant Tracking System (ATS) with a robust HR Information System (HRIS). This powerful structure helps you manage the entire employee lifecycle, starting from attraction and extending through payroll reporting. The system uses great design and advanced artificial intelligence to hide complexity, ensuring the software feels easy while remaining powerful under the hood. It’s built for businesses that require high performance, scalability, and reliability. 💡
Highlights
Feature Comparison
Features Overview
We highlight the main differences and pick a winner for each feature.
ATS vs HRIS
Workable is a powerful all-in-one ATS plus HRIS system. TeamTailor focuses specialized attention strictly on recruiting functionality.
TeamTailor is a dedicated Applicant Tracking System that focuses only on pre-hire tasks. It efficiently manages everything from job posting, screening, to offer generation. TeamTailor delivers depth and a smooth experience within the recruiting funnel. Workable includes a full HRIS component alongside its ATS capabilities. This handles post-hire management, including PTO, employee data, and performance reviews. Workable is appealing if you want to consolidate recruiting and core HR processes. This is a major functional decision: depth in recruiting (TeamTailor) versus comprehensive breadth (Workable). Workable allows you to ditch a separate HRIS tool entirely. If consolidating systems reduces your admin headache, Workable will be the better fit.
AI Sourcing Power
Workable uses strong AI for sourcing from 400M profiles; TeamTailor uses AI Co-pilot for internal speed.
TeamTailor’s AI Co-pilot helps recruiters handle routine admin quickly. It drafts job descriptions, summarizes meetings, and screens initial CVs for internal efficiency. TeamTailor focuses on speed within your existing pipeline. Workable uses powerful AI specifically for external sourcing and candidate outreach. It actively pulls pre-qualified candidates from a 400+ million profile database. Workable also drafts personalized outreach content. If bulk external candidate sourcing is your primary recruiting challenge, Workable provides a clear advantage. TeamTailor excels at optimizing your existing recruiter workflows with smart automation. Both tools use AI well, but pursue different goals. Some users find Workable’s automated source tracking unreliable, requiring manual updates. TeamTailor’s automation focuses on guaranteed internal workflow improvements.
Employer Branding Focus
TeamTailor enables extreme customization for branded career pages. Workable offers branded pages with less visual marketing focus.
TeamTailor excels because it helps you build highly customized, stunning career pages. This focus helps candidates connect with your company culture and values. TeamTailor treats your careers site like a marketing asset. Workable provides branded, mobile-optimized career pages standard with its ATS. They are professional and clean, ensuring a smooth application process. Workable prioritizes function and simplicity over pure aesthetic control. If differentiating your company via a visually unique careers page is a priority, choose TeamTailor. TeamTailor’s commitment to strong employer branding is unparalleled in this comparison. Workable provides a strong application flow, but less branding flexibility.
3rd Party Integrations
TeamTailor offers 450+ integrations for huge flexibility; Workable supports over 270 essential connections.
TeamTailor boasts a massive integrations ecosystem supporting 450+ unique applications and tools. This extensive library ensures it fits easily into almost any specialized tech stack. TeamTailor is the clear compatibility champion by sheer volume. Workable supports 270+ integrations, focusing on deep connectivity with core HR systems. It highlights links to crucial payroll tools like ADP Workforce Now and Xero. Workable ensures tight coupling with post-hire essential systems. If you use many niche marketing, assessment, or analytics tools, TeamTailor offers wider compatibility. Workable ensures tight coupling with your necessary payroll and HR functions. Both tools connect well, but TeamTailor offers a much larger ecosystem.
Cost Transparency
Workable lists its base pricing publicly; TeamTailor requires contacting sales for all detailed pricing information.
TeamTailor states its pricing starts at 0, but detailed tiered plans are not public. Budgeting teams must contact sales to obtain a specialized, custom quote. This lack of initial transparency can slow down evaluation. Workable publicly displays its Standard ($299/month) and Premier ($599/month) base pricing. Be aware that these rates apply only to companies with 1-20 employees. Workable is very transparent about its starting point. Workable's model scales quickly based on total employee headcount, causing significant price jumps past the 20-person mark. TeamTailor’s custom quote process likely means costs vary widely based on required features and scale. Choose Workable for initial clarity.
Interface & UX
TeamTailor is praised for easy, modern usability; Workable's UI sometimes receives complaints about being clunky.
TeamTailor is consistently lauded for its extremely user-friendly and highly intuitive interface. High usability boosts adoption across non-recruiting managers and hiring teams. Onboarding is simplified by the smooth design. Workable reviews indicate inconsistency, with some users reporting the interface is clunky or buggy. Flawed candidate source tracking often requires frustrating manual, time-consuming updates. Slow-loading pages are also occasionally noted. TeamTailor offers a more modern platform built explicitly for ease of use and collaboration. Workable's extensive feature set sometimes sacrifices interface fluidity. If maximum user adoption is key, TeamTailor has a clear advantage.
Our Verdict
Choosing between TeamTailor and Workable comes down to a fundamental infrastructure decision. Workable offers the ultimate all-in-one consolidation, while TeamTailor delivers superior usability and branding power. Your current HR stack determines the easy winner. TeamTailor shines brightest in employer branding and extreme ease of use. It helps you build customized career pages better than Workable for attracting candidates. TeamTailor has extensive compatibility with 450+ integrations available. If non-recruiters frequently touch the system, TeamTailor’s intuitive UI is highly beneficial. Workable's superpower is its comprehensive ATS plus HRIS functionality in one platform. It includes core HR features like time-tracking and payroll preparation automatically. Workable also leverages AI for powerful sourcing from a 400 million profile database globally. It is built for complex, high-performance global organizations requiring security compliance. The critical deciding factor is your post-hire needs outside of recruiting. If you already have a beloved, dedicated HRIS tool, utilize TeamTailor’s focused ATS power. If you need to centralize both pre-hire and post-hire functions in one system, Workable is efficient. Choose TeamTailor if strong candidate experience and high internal adoption are your goals. Pick Workable if you demand a single, robust platform certified for enterprise security and HR compliance across the organization.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which software is better for employer branding: TeamTailor or Workable?
TeamTailor is the clear winner for employer branding and career page customization. It specializes in helping you build visually compelling career pages. Workable offers branded pages, but they are less flexible and marketing-focused.
Does Workable include an HRIS, or is it only an ATS?
Workable is a comprehensive platform combining a powerful ATS and a full HRIS. It manages the entire employee lifecycle, including PTO, performance reviews, and payroll preparation. TeamTailor focuses solely on the recruiting lifecycle (ATS).
Which tool offers greater integration flexibility with other apps?
TeamTailor is the integration champion, supporting over 450 different apps and tools. Workable supports 270+ integrations, focusing on essential HR and payroll connectivity. Choose TeamTailor if you have many niche recruiting tools.
Is Workable worth the potentially higher cost over TeamTailor?
Workable bundles comprehensive ATS/HRIS features, saving you money on a separate HR system. TeamTailor may cost less for very large companies, but Workable's price scales steeply based on employee headcount. It is worth it if you need the full HR bundle.
How efficient is the AI candidate sourcing in Workable compared to TeamTailor?
Workable uses powerful AI to proactively source candidates from a 400M profile database. TeamTailor's AI Co-pilot focuses on helping recruiters automate internal tasks like drafting descriptions. Workable is better for external sourcing.
Which platform is generally considered to be more user-friendly?
TeamTailor is consistently praised as being extremely user-friendly with a modern UI. Workable receives complaints from some users experiencing clunky or slow sections. TeamTailor offers a better day-to-day user experience.
Ready to Choose?
Both tools have their strengths. Choose based on your specific needs.