CASTANET vs Lusha

This is a showdown between automated prospecting flow and sheer contact data volume. CASTANET offers reliable, continuous LinkedIn automation focused on prospect context. Lusha provides massive B2B data but faces significant user concerns regarding privacy and trust. Deciding between CASTANET and Lusha means weighing compliance against contact scaling.

CASTANET
CASTANET

Solid 24/7 lead-gen tool

Ciroapp review
4.3
#3 in Lead Generation

We see CASTANET as practical, scalable automation for sales teams, with 24/7 lead generation and clear fit signals. Overall, it's a solid choice for steady pipeline growth, though onboarding speed and pricing should be considered.

Pros

  • 24/7 lead generation keeps your pipeline flowing.
  • Clear 'why fit' signals using schools, groups, and events.
  • Easy CRM exports via Zapier or Google Sheets.
  • Deep Zapier integrations and Slack notifications.

Cons

  • Pricing/value can vary by team size.
  • Onboarding could be faster.
  • Dependence on Zapier for advanced integrations.
  • Learning curve for non-technical users.
Pricing
7–100
Free trial
Money-back
Best for
Sales teams prioritizing compliant, steady LinkedIn outreach, Teams needing context-rich 'why fit' signals for personalization, Users who value predictable monthly SaaS costs over usage complexity
Lusha
Lusha

Strong data, risky privacy practices

Ciroapp review
2.4
#8 in Lead Generation

We review Lusha as a go-to prospecting tool that delivers real-time leads and automation, supported by high-accuracy contact data. Yet real-world sentiment highlights privacy concerns, unsolicited outreach, and data quality doubts. Overall, we find value in the features, but trust and compliance risks temper its appeal.

Pros

  • Real-time leads and signals shorten pipeline
  • Automated outreach and CRM syncing save time
  • Large verified database (280M+ contacts) with high accuracy (85% phone, 98% email)
  • Seamless integrations with existing tools

Cons

  • Privacy concerns and data handling raise trust issues
  • Unsolicited outreach and spam linked to data source
  • Data quality can be inconsistent
  • GDPR/compliance worries and right-to-forget challenges
Pricing
0–8211/month
Free trial
Money-back
Best for
RevOps teams needing massive B2B contact data enrichment (280M+), Marketers running ABM campaigns based on real-time buying signals, Sales organizations needing high-accuracy email and phone data access
Quick verdict
Choose CASTANET if you prioritize reliable, 24/7 automated outreach on LinkedIn and need clear 'why fit' signals for trustworthy personalization.
Choose Lusha if your GTM engine needs high-volume contact details (280M+), high deliverability metrics, and access to real-time B2B buying signals.

AboutCASTANET

💼 CASTANET is a lead-generation tool for LinkedIn designed for sales teams and professionals who want steady, automated prospecting. It helps you understand why a prospect is a fit by noting the schools they attended, the groups they belong to, and the events they attend. It exports lead profiles to your CRM automatically via Zapier or Google Sheets, and it can connect to Slack or thousands of apps through Zapier.

AboutLusha

Lusha AI is a B2B sales platform that helps teams find verified contacts and signals to move deals faster. It surfaces ready-to-connect prospects and automates outreach and data workflows so reps can stay focused on selling. 🎯

The tool is pitched for multiple roles—Sales, RevOps, Marketers, and Recruiters—and it works with your existing tools to enrich CRM data and streamline follow-ups.

Highlights

Quick winners by category at a glance.
Ease of Use
CASTANET focuses on set-and-forget 24/7 automation flow for LinkedIn prospecting. Lusha’s credit system and broader feature set increase initial complexity for users.
Data Accuracy Claims
Lusha claims 85% phone accuracy and 98% email deliverability from its 280M+ database. CASTANET relies on standard LinkedIn data extraction and doesn't publish accuracy numbers.
Value for Money
CASTANET provides reliable, guaranteed automation for a fixed fee. Lusha provides immense data scale for lower initial cost, but its use comes with compliance and trust risks.
Tie
Customer Trust & Reviews
CASTANET holds a strong 4.3 rating, focusing on reliability and flow. Lusha's rating (2.4) is significantly lower due to serious privacy issues reported by users.
Integration Options
Lusha has stronger native support for major CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot, plus API/MCP features. CASTANET relies heavily on Zapier for deep CRM synchronization.
Scalability
Lusha’s 280M+ contact database and customized Scale plans support massive enterprise usage. CASTANET is highly scalable for automated LinkedIn outreach but not external data ingestion.

Feature Comparison

Compare key features side by side
Core Focus
CASTANET:LinkedIn Lead Generation
Lusha:B2B Contact Data & Signals
Tie
Automation Scope
CASTANET:24/7 Lead Flow & CRM Sync
Lusha:Outreach Sequences & Data Enrichment
Tie
Database Size
CASTANET:LinkedIn Context Data Only
Lusha:280M+ Verified Contacts
Tie
Phone Accuracy Claim
CASTANET:Not Specified
Lusha:85% Accuracy
Lusha
Email Deliverability Claim
CASTANET:Not Specified
Lusha:98% Deliverability
Lusha
Prospect Fit Signals
CASTANET:Schools, Groups, Events Attended
Lusha:Real-time Buying Signals & Intent
Tie
Required Integrations for CRM
CASTANET:Zapier or Google Sheets Required
Lusha:Native integration (Salesforce/HubSpot) + API
Tie
Free Plan Available
CASTANET:
Lusha:
Lusha
Free Trial Offered
CASTANET:
Lusha:
CASTANET
Privacy Concerns Reported
CASTANET:None Reported in Data
Lusha:Extensive user reports (Spam/GDPR)
Tie
Pricing Model
CASTANET:Fixed Monthly Tiered Plans
Lusha:Usage-based Credit System
Tie
Credit Roll Over
CASTANET:N/A (No Credits)
Lusha:Yes (Monthly plans, 2x limit)
Lusha
Slack Notifications
CASTANET:
Lusha:
Tie
AI-Powered Features
CASTANET:Contextual Fit Signals
Lusha:AI-ready lists, AI-powered candidate lists
Tie
Target Audience
CASTANET:Sales Pros seeking steady flow
Lusha:Sales, RevOps, Marketers, Recruiters
Tie
Chrome Extension
CASTANET:
Lusha:
Lusha
Unlimited Campaigns/Steps (Top Tier)
CASTANET:
Lusha:Customizable Scale Plan
Tie
Explicit GDPR/Compliance Focus
CASTANET:Not Specified
Lusha:Major user concerns cited
Lusha
Highest Plan Cost (Approx.)
CASTANET:$399/month (Team)
Lusha:$8,211+/month (Scale/Custom)
CASTANET
Money-Back Guarantee
CASTANET:100% Satisfaction (Trial)
Lusha:Not Specified
CASTANET
Feature Comparison Summary
3
CASTANET
11
Ties
6
Lusha

Features Overview

We highlight the main differences and pick a winner for each feature.

Data Trust & Compliance

Trust is the critical difference; CASTANET shows reliability while Lusha faces major privacy scrutiny.

CASTANET

CASTANET receives generally positive reviews for reliable functionality and steady lead flow. User feedback highlights CASTANET's strength in consistent, automated prospecting without major complaints. Lusha struggles immensely with user trust regarding data handling and unsolicited outreach. Its user rating is significantly low due to these serious privacy concerns and GDPR worries. The core trade-off: use CASTANET for trusted process automation or accept the trust risk with Lusha's data volume. Many users report difficulty with Lusha's opt-out processes and auto-renewal friction. If brand safety and compliance are paramount for your team, CASTANET is the much safer choice. Lusha's data quality and sourcing methodology are often questioned by frustrated users.

Lead Context Strategy

CASTANET targets relational context; Lusha targets real-time buying signals and intent.

Tie

CASTANET delivers unique 'why fit' signals for prospects, showing schools, groups, and events. This rich context helps sales teams tailor the outreach message effectively and avoid generic connections. Lusha’s strength is surfacing real-time leads and buying signals to shorten the entire sales pipeline. It focuses more on intent and immediate action rather than deep relational context. Use CASTANET when manual personalization based on LinkedIn activity is crucial for your outreach. Choose Lusha when timing your reach based on live buying signals is your priority. CASTANET is about quality, context-driven connections; Lusha is about speed and large-scale signal detection.

Contact Data Volume

Lusha commands a massive B2B database; CASTANET focuses only on reliable, automated LinkedIn activity.

Lusha

Lusha impresses with its massive resource pool of 280M+ verified B2B contacts for global scaling. Lusha highlights high deliverability, claiming 85% phone and 98% email accuracy. CASTANET concentrates on automating LinkedIn actions and exporting profile details discovered during prospecting campaigns. It does not provide an external database of 280M+ contacts like Lusha does. Teams needing high-volume B2B contact enrichment across various channels should leverage Lusha’s scale. Teams primarily focused on LinkedIn pipeline generation will find CASTANET sufficient for data extraction. Lusha provides the raw material (data); CASTANET provides the automated factory (LinkedIn connector).

Integration & Workflows

Lusha offers native CRM embeds; CASTANET relies heavily on Zapier for synchronization pathways.

Lusha

CASTANET’s integration backbone relies deeply on Zapier to connect lead export to thousands of apps, including Slack and CRMs. It also supports simple lead profile exports via Google Sheets. Lusha offers robust native connections to tools like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Outreach for direct data enrichment and syncing. Lusha also includes MCP and API support for highly custom workflows. If you prefer pre-built, native connections like Salesforce hooks, Lusha is generally the smoother option. CASTANET requires reliance on Zapier for complex, multi-step CRM synchronizations. Both tools support Slack notifications for team alignment, but Lusha offers deeper, more integrated data flow for RevOps teams.

Pricing Structure

CASTANET uses fixed tiers; Lusha employs a confusing, usage-based credit system.

CASTANET

CASTANET offers clear, fixed monthly pricing across three tiers: Basic ($99), Sales Pro ($199), and Team ($399). Pricing includes fixed limits on LinkedIn campaign access. Lusha uses a usage-based credit system, where an email costs 1 credit and a phone number costs 10 credits. While Lusha has a free plan, the costs scale quickly and can be unpredictable. If budget predictability is essential, CASTANET’s fixed monthly fee is much easier to manage. Lusha's credit usage demands careful tracking to prevent unexpected costs. Monthly unused Lusha credits roll over up to twice the plan limit, but annual credits reset, adding complexity to Lusha's budgeting process.

Deployment & Trial Experience

CASTANET offers a risk-free 7-day trial; Lusha starts with a limited, sustained Free plan.

CASTANET

CASTANET offers a 7-day free trial along with a 100% satisfaction guarantee for new users. This lets users test the 24/7 automation flow and CRM export capabilities quickly. Lusha provides a Free plan that includes 70 credits per month, covering basic prospecting features and the browser extension. You get sustained, low-level access immediately. The CASTANET trial is ideal for short, intensive testing of automated processes before committing to $99/month. Lusha’s free tier lets solo users manage low-volume needs indefinitely. If you need to test full functionality quickly, the CASTANET 7-day trial is superior to Lusha’s credit-limited Free plan.

Our Verdict

Objective guidance based on features, pricing, and user fit.

Choosing between CASTANET and Lusha means deciding between trust and massive scale. For most small to mid-sized sales teams, CASTANET is the recommended choice due to its stability and higher trust rating. Lusha offers a huge database, but its well-documented privacy risks are a significant detractor for many users. CASTANET absolutely dominates in the realm of reliable, automated LinkedIn flow. It gives you clear 'why fit' signals, using schools and groups to help tailor outreach effectively. CASTANET’s fixed pricing model also ensures your prospecting budget stays predictable and controlled every month. Lusha's superpower is its sheer volume and claimed data accuracy across 280 million B2B contacts. If your RevOps or Sales team focuses on high-volume lists and real-time buying signals, Lusha delivers that data. It also offers stronger native integration paths into CRMs like Salesforce. The deciding factor should be your risk tolerance regarding data provenance and compliance. CASTANET provides a steady, proven, and compliant automation experience. Lusha’s low 2.4 rating reflects major user anxiety over unsolicited calls and data handling practices. If you need trusted, automated LinkedIn lead flow, stick with CASTANET. If your priority is massive data enrichment and you can overlook serious user privacy concerns, Lusha can scale your contact lists aggressively.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which tool is cheaper for a small team: CASTANET or Lusha?

Lusha offers a perpetual Free plan with 70 credits per month. CASTANET does not have a free plan and starts at $99/month. However, Lusha’s credit system can lead to higher costs if you rely heavily on phone numbers.

Does Lusha offer the same automated LinkedIn outreach as CASTANET?

Lusha focuses on data access and timing via buying signals and extensions for LinkedIn. CASTANET specializes in 24/7 lead generation sequences and automated CRM exports through LinkedIn. CASTANET is purely focused on that process flow.

Which tool has better CRM integration options?

Lusha offers stronger native integration with major CRMs like Salesforce and HubSpot, plus API options. CASTANET relies heavily on Zapier and Google Sheets for lead profile exports and synchronization.

Is CASTANET a safer choice for data privacy compared to Lusha?

Based on user reviews, yes. CASTANET has a strong 4.3 rating with no significant privacy complaints listed. Lusha’s low 2.4 rating is highly attributed to user reports of privacy issues and unsolicited outreach.

Does CASTANET provide contact numbers like Lusha does?

Lusha provides access to a database offering phone numbers and emails for millions of contacts. CASTANET extracts available lead data from LinkedIn profiles during automated prospecting flow.

How often do credits reset on Lusha, and what about CASTANET?

Lusha credits reset monthly, and on the monthly plan, unused credits roll over up to double your limit. CASTANET does not use a credit system; its fixed features reset monthly subscription periods.

Ready to Choose?

Both tools have their strengths. Choose based on your specific needs.