Backlog by Nulab Inc and Wrike are both project management powerhouses, but they serve different masters. Backlog by Nulab Inc shines for dev teams with built-in code tools. Wrike is built for large, cross-functional enterprises needing deep automation.
Solid all-in-one for dev teams.
Overall, we find Backlog to be a capable and cost-effective platform that effectively merges project management, issue tracking, and code collaboration into a single tool. It's a strong choice for small to mid-sized teams looking to simplify their workflow without per-user costs.
Sức mạnh Doanh nghiệp Gặp gỡ Sự Cam kết Phức tạp.
Chúng tôi nhận thấy Wrike là một giải pháp dự án cực kỳ linh hoạt, được ghi nhận vì có khả năng mở rộng hiệu quả trên các môi trường tập đoàn lên đến 3000 người dùng và hợp nhất giao tiếp trên các quy trình làm việc cực kỳ phức tạp. Nhìn chung, phần mềm cung cấp một bộ tính năng mạnh mẽ cho khả năng hiển thị nâng cao và tùy chỉnh, nhưng chúng tôi cảnh báo người dùng về các đăng ký hàng năm cố định và những khó khăn đã được ghi nhận trong việc quản lý việc gia hạn tự động và tăng giá.
Backlog is an all-in-one work management platform built for teams that build, plan, or create. 🚀 It combines project management, issue tracking, and team collaboration into a single, powerful tool. This makes it ideal for development teams managing code and bugs, design teams planning sprints, marketing teams running campaigns, and small businesses seeking a straightforward solution without user limits.
Wrike là một giải pháp quản lý công việc doanh nghiệp toàn diện đáng tin cậy. Nó được thiết kế cho các tổ chức đã sẵn sàng chuyển đổi các quy trình thủ công thành các quy trình làm việc tự động, được kết nối với nhau. Các nhóm từ 20 đến 20.000 người dùng đều phát triển mạnh mẽ tại đây vì Wrike có khả năng thích ứng cao với bất kỳ ngành nghề hoặc quy mô nào. Nó đưa nhiều nhóm vào cùng một nơi để cộng tác trực quan tạo ra sự thay đổi lớn. Wrike là nơi bạn có thể dễ dàng liên kết chiến lược và thực hiện hiệu quả các dự án và chương trình của mình. 💡
Chúng tôi làm nổi bật những khác biệt chính và chọn người chiến thắng cho từng tính năng.
Backlog by Nulab Inc charges a flat fee. Wrike charges per user, per month.
Backlog by Nulab Inc uses flat-fee pricing. Your team pays the same price whether you have 5 or 50 users. Plans range from $0 to $210 per month. Wrike uses per-user pricing. You pay $10 to $25 per user each month. This is billed annually for paid plans. A team of 10 on Business costs $250/month. The key difference is scaling cost. Adding a new developer to Backlog by Nulab Inc costs $0 extra. Adding one to Wrike costs $10-$25 more monthly. For a growing team of 20, this saves thousands annually with Backlog by Nulab Inc.
Backlog by Nulab Inc has native Git and SVN. Wrike does not.
Backlog by Nulab Inc includes built-in Git and SVN repositories. Developers can commit code directly linked to issues. This keeps code and tasks in sync. Wrike offers no built-in version control. Development teams must use external tools like GitHub. Then connect them via integrations. This is a major difference for software teams. Backlog by Nulab Inc creates a true single platform. Wrike requires extra tools and context switching for code management.
Wrike offers deep, scalable automation. Backlog by Nulab Inc has simpler rules.
Backlog by Nulab Inc provides basic workflow automation. You can set up rules for task assignments and status changes. It covers core needs. Wrike provides powerful automation. The Team plan gives 50 actions per user monthly. The Business plan offers 200 actions. Enterprise plans go up to 1500. Wrike's automation is more granular and scalable. It's built for complex, cross-department processes. Backlog by Nulab Inc is sufficient for straightforward team workflows.
Wrike has advanced resource planning tools. Backlog by Nulab Inc is more basic.
Backlog by Nulab Inc offers basic task assignment and progress tracking. It helps you see who is doing what. Wrike provides dedicated Resource Management. You can plan capacity, forecast workloads, and prevent team burnout. It's a core feature of the Business plan. Wrike gives managers a strategic view of team bandwidth. This is critical for large, multi-project organizations. Backlog by Nulab Inc focuses more on task execution than resource forecasting.
Wrike provides real-time, visual reports. Backlog by Nulab Inc has standard reporting.
Backlog by Nulab Inc includes standard reports. You can track project progress, burndown charts, and issue trends. The data is solid. Wrike offers real-time reports in visual dashboards. Its Business plan unlocks advanced reporting. Enterprise adds business intelligence tools. Wrike's reporting is more dynamic and customizable. It's designed for data-driven decision-making at scale. Backlog by Nulab Inc's reports are effective for team-level tracking.
Wrike integrates with over 400 apps. Backlog by Nulab Inc connects with key tools.
Backlog by Nulab Inc integrates with Slack, Teams, Google Drive, and more. It offers a robust API for custom builds. Wrike boasts over 400 integrations. It connects with Slack, Microsoft, Adobe, Salesforce, and Jira. Wrike Integrate syncs data rapidly. Wrike's integration ecosystem is vastly larger. It's built to be the central hub for enterprise software stacks. Backlog by Nulab Inc covers the essentials most teams need.
Backlog by Nulab Inc is often simpler. Wrike can be complex to set up.
Backlog by Nulab Inc is designed for clarity. Its interface for issues and code is straightforward. Users report a learning curve but find it clean. Wrike is highly customizable but can be complex. New teams often need professional onboarding. The platform has many features to configure. Backlog by Nulab Inc offers a quicker start for core tasks. Wrike requires more investment upfront but offers deeper customization.
Both offer SAML and strong security. Wrike provides more granular controls.
Backlog by Nulab Inc offers SAML authentication on its Enterprise plan. It provides centralized management and a dedicated CSM. Wrike provides SAML, 2FA, custom access roles, and user audit reports. Its Enterprise plan includes password policies and custom user types. Wrike's security controls are more detailed. This suits large, regulated organizations. Backlog by Nulab Inc's security is robust for most enterprise needs.
Both have solid mobile apps for core tasks. No clear winner.
Backlog by Nulab Inc offers a mobile app for quick checks. You can view tasks, update statuses, and collaborate on the go. Wrike also provides full-featured iOS and Android apps. You can manage tasks, view Gantt charts, and approve work from your phone. Both apps allow essential work away from the desk. They serve as useful companions to the desktop platform. Neither app replaces the full power of the web version for complex work.
Backlog by Nulab Inc pricing: Backlog by Nulab Inc offers a range of flat-fee plans starting from a free tier up to $175 per month, with no per-user fees. You can save 17% by choosing annual billing for any paid plan level reached by your team's needs. Plans range: $0–$210/month Billing options: Free plan, Free trial, Monthly subscription, Yearly subscription, Per seat pricing, Usage-based pricing

Wrike có giá từ $0 đến $25 mỗi người dùng/tháng, với năm gói: Miễn phí ở mức $0/người dùng/tháng, Team ở mức $10/người dùng/tháng, Business ở mức $25/người dùng/tháng, và Enterprise, Pinnacle yêu cầu người dùng liên hệ với bộ phận kinh doanh.
We found that external review platforms like Trustpilot were not accessible due to verification errors, preventing us from gathering specific user sentiment from those sources. Capterra was not provided.
Therefore, our review is based solely on the official product information and pricing details from Nulab. ✅ We can confirm Backlog offers a unified platform for project management, issue tracking, and collaboration with built-in Git/SVN support and no per-user fees.
Backlog is great for keeping all our code and tasks in one place. The Git integration is seamless, and my team stopped switching between five different apps. It just works for our sprint planning.
Người dùng nhất quán ca ngợi khả năng mạnh mẽ của Wrike trong việc chuyển đổi quản lý quy trình làm việc và thúc đẩy hiệu quả tổ chức. Nhiều nhà đánh giá, bao gồm cả trưởng nhóm và người dùng doanh nghiệp lớn, gọi đây là một trong những hệ thống Quản lý Dự án tốt nhất hiện có, lưu ý rằng nó rất phù hợp cho các tùy chỉnh cấp cao cho các phương pháp luận cụ thể như OKR.
Khả năng tập trung giao tiếp, cung cấp khả năng hiển thị 360° và quản lý cộng tác trên các nhóm toàn cầu lớn thường được nêu bật là không có gì sánh bằng. Hơn nữa, hỗ trợ khách hàng thường được mô tả là mẫu mực, đặc biệt liên quan đến việc triển khai và sửa lỗi nhanh chóng.
Sử dụng Wrike trong ba năm đã hoàn toàn thay đổi cách chúng tôi quản lý quy trình làm việc của mình. Sự thay đổi lớn nhất là hoạt động của chúng tôi đã trở nên hợp lý và nhanh chóng như thế nào. Nó thực sự hiệu quả cho đội ngũ lớn của chúng tôi.
This isn't a one-size-fits-all showdown. Backlog by Nulab Inc and Wrike are built for different teams with different priorities. Your choice hinges on your team's size, budget, and workflow complexity. Backlog by Nulab Inc's superpower is its seamless blend of project management and code collaboration. The flat-fee pricing is a game-changer for growing teams. It removes the fear of per-user costs. Wrike's superpower is its enterprise-grade depth. It excels at complex resource planning, advanced automation, and visual collaboration across massive organizations. It's built to scale to 20,000 users. The deciding factor is often cost versus capability. If you need advanced features and have the budget, Wrike delivers. If you want simplicity and predictable costs, Backlog by Nulab Inc wins. Choose Backlog by Nulab Inc if you're a dev team under 50 people. It's your cost-effective, code-centric command center. Choose Wrike if you're an enterprise with 200+ users. It will untangle your most complex workflows.
Backlog by Nulab Inc is generally better for small teams. Its flat-fee pricing means costs don't increase with each new hire. Wrike's per-user model can get expensive quickly for a growing small team.
Yes, Backlog by Nulab Inc includes built-in Git and SVN repositories. Wrike does not offer built-in version control. Development teams must use external tools and integrations with Wrike.
It depends on your needs. Wrike is worth it if you require advanced resource planning, deep automation, or proofing for 200+ users. For smaller teams, Backlog by Nulab Inc provides great value at a lower total cost.
Migration is possible but not one-click. Backlog by Nulab Inc has import tools for Jira and Redmine. Moving to Wrike would require manual data transfer or using Wrike's professional services for a guided setup.
Wrike offers significantly more powerful automation. Its Business plan gives 200 automation actions per user per month. Backlog by Nulab Inc has basic workflow rules for task updates and assignments.
Wrike has better reporting. It offers real-time reports in visual dashboards and advanced business intelligence on higher plans. Backlog by Nulab Inc provides standard, effective project reports.
Cả hai công cụ đều có điểm mạnh riêng. Chọn dựa trên nhu cầu cụ thể của bạn.