Trello and Wrike both manage projects incredibly well, but they target different users. Trello excels at visual simplicity and quick adoption for smaller teams. Wrike is built for complex enterprise workflows and deep resource management. You need to choose between flexibility and comprehensive control.
Wir finden, dass Trello aufgrund seiner einfachen Bedienung schnell außergewöhnlichen Mehrwert liefert. Die Kanban-Visualisierung ist sehr flexibel für Team-Workflows. Insgesamt ist Trello ein leistungsstarkes Tool, aber Stabilitätsprobleme und frustrierende administrative Reibungspunkte wie das Atlassian-Login bremsen es aus.
Unternehmenspower trifft auf komplexe Verpflichtung.
Wir finden, dass Wrike eine außergewöhnlich vielseitige Projektlösung ist, die dafür bekannt ist, effizient in Unternehmensumgebungen mit bis zu 3000 Benutzern zu skalieren und die Kommunikation über hochkomplexe Workflows hinweg zu vereinheitlichen. Insgesamt bietet die Software eine leistungsstarke Funktionspalette für fortgeschrittene Transparenz und Anpassung, wir raten Benutzern jedoch zur Vorsicht wegen der starren Jahresabonnements und der dokumentierten Schwierigkeiten bei der Verwaltung der automatischen Verlängerung und von Preiserhöhungen.
Trello wurde entwickelt, um Sie an der Spitze Ihres Spiels zu halten, indem es sicherstellt, dass jede Aufgabe oder Idee, unabhängig von ihrer Größe, ihren richtigen Platz findet. Das System hilft Ihnen, organisiert und effizient zu bleiben, und nutzt dafür drei Schlüsselkomponenten: Inbox, Boards und Planner.
Die Inbox erfasst schnell Aufgaben, sobald sie Ihnen in den Sinn kommen, egal ob Sie im Büro oder unterwegs sind. Sie verwalten Ihre Aufgaben mit flexiblen Boards, wobei lange Listen durch Verfolgung der Elemente von „zu erledigende Aufgaben“ bis „Mission erfüllt!“ handhabbar werden. Nutzen Sie den Planner, um Ihre wichtigsten Aufgaben einfach per Drag-and-Drop direkt in Ihren Kalender zu ziehen und so sicherzustellen, dass Sie Zeit für das einplanen, was wirklich zählt. 💡
Wrike ist eine vertrauenswürdige End-to-End Enterprise Work Management Lösung. Sie wurde für Organisationen entwickelt, die bereit sind, manuelle Prozesse in vernetzte, automatisierte Workflows umzuwandeln. Teams von 20 bis zu 20.000 Nutzern gedeihen hier, da Wrike sich leicht an jede Branche oder Größe anpassen lässt. Es bringt mehrere Teams an denselben Ort für eine bahnbrechende visuelle Zusammenarbeit. Wrike ist der Ort, an dem Sie Strategie einfach abstimmen und Ihre Projekte und Programme effektiv umsetzen können. 💡
Wir heben die Hauptunterschiede hervor und wählen einen Gewinner für jede Funktion.
Trello is pure visual Kanban ease; Wrike offers many highly flexible views.
Trello's design is immediately intuitive, relying on the visual Kanban structure. New users adopt Trello instantly due to its visual simplicity. It organizes everything clearly using cards, lists, and boards easily. Wrike is feature-rich but requires much more customization across multiple views. It offers Lists, Boards, Gantt Charts, and Tables for diverse viewing needs. If your team hates clicking through tutorials, Trello's lower learning curve is a massive benefit. Wrike provides complexity necessary for advanced project oversight from the start, which increases setup time.
Wrike gives 360° visibility; Trello focuses visibility on specific boards.
Trello Premium includes Dashboard, Timeline, and Table views. Card Mirroring allows tracking cards across different boards effectively. Wrike provides robust 360° visibility across all projects and departments. It uses Gantt Charts and resource tools for deep organizational oversight. Trello optimizes visibility for the individual project or team level. Wrike is engineered for cross-departmental executive visibility. Large program managers tracking resources across 50+ projects prefer Wrike's systemic view.
Trello is flexible monthly/annual; Wrike demands rigid annual commitments.
Trello offers a generous permanent Free plan for small teams. Paid plans are available monthly or yearly for increased flexibility. The Standard plan starts at $5/user/month annually. Wrike's paid plans require a mandated annual subscription commitment. This inflexible structure carries risk upon renewal or cancellation. Trello is ideal for budget-conscious teams who need maximum flexibility. User reviews strongly caution against Wrike's aggressive renewal pricing practices.
Wrike specializes in resource allocation; Trello lacks dedicated resource tools.
Trello focuses purely on task management and visual workflow. It does not include native tools for optimizing team member capacity planning. Wrike's Business plan includes powerful Resource and Capacity Planning tools. Managers see team utilization across all projects instantly. If you need to strategically allocate human resources, Wrike is the clear choice. Wrike helps large organizations keep all deadlines on track by preventing over-allocation.
Trello uses simple rules; Wrike provides higher volume, per-user quotas.
Trello includes powerful, built-in no-code automation on every board. The Free plan starts with 250 command runs per month. Premium users benefit from unlimited Workspace command runs. Wrike offers automation quotas that scale substantially per user count. The Business plan provides 200 automation actions per user monthly. Trello focuses on automating simple board actions like card movement. Wrike supports deeper, high-volume, cross-functional automation and sync. If your team relies on sophisticated rule chains, Wrike's scale is necessary.
Trello uses AI for task capture; Wrike uses AI for advanced analysis.
Trello uses Atlassian Intelligence (AI) to transform forwarded emails into organized tasks. This feature quickly generates summaries and needed links. Wrike integrates advanced AI capabilities into every work management layer. AI-driven analytics predict risk and optimize resource allocation proactively. Trello's AI is about productivity and getting tasks into the system faster. Wrike's AI is about data-driven decision-making and forecasting. Project managers needing to forecast scope creep or risk mitigation will find Wrike's analysis more valuable.
Wrike provides built-in file proofing; Trello needs Power-Ups or external tools.
Trello lacks a native, dedicated module for content asset proofing. Users must rely on attachments and comments for feedback loops. This process is adequate for text-based tasks. Wrike Business offers built-in File and Video Proofing for over 30 formats. It includes options for seamless external guest approvals. Teams handling large volumes of visual or video assets must choose Wrike. Agencies use Wrike to save hours by drastically speeding up client feedback loops.
Both compliant, but Wrike offers more customizable enterprise user controls.
Trello is SOC2 Type 2 and ISO certified for security reliability. Enterprise customers get free SSO using Atlassian Guard for central control. Security features are generally strong across Trello’s paid tiers. Wrike also holds SOC2 Type II and multiple ISO certifications. It offers custom access roles and customizable user types in higher plans. Wrike supports advanced security features like Locked Spaces for secure collaboration. Heavily regulated industries often prefer Wrike for its detailed permission control and granular roles.
Trello and Wrike represent two distinct project philosophies for your team. Trello is the flexible, easy-to-use visual powerhouse perfect for fast action. Wrike is the robust, complex machine built for deep organizational control and large scale. Teams must choose between friendly simplicity or high-octane engineering. Trello’s superpower is its phenomenal ease of use and low barrier to entry. New teams can start managing tasks in Trello within minutes using the beloved Kanban view. The permanent Free plan makes Trello the ultimate choice for small teams watching their budget closely. Trello's AI transforms emails into actionable tasks, making quick capture simple. Wrike's superpower lies in its enterprise-grade features and ability to handle complexity. Wrike provides critical resource planning tools to prevent systematic team overload. Wrike also crushes Trello in review workflows, offering built-in file and video proofing. Managers get 360° visibility across every department using Wrike's advanced analytics. The deciding factor is whether you need flexibility or deep governance and oversight. If you lead a small team and value quick adoption, Trello is your clear winner. If you manage large, cross-functional programs and require mandatory annual commitment, Wrike provides the necessary controls. Pick Wrike for predictable complexity and Trello for visual simplicity.
Trello is generally better for small teams and startups. Trello offers a generous Free plan and a very low learning curve for fast adoption. Wrike's paid tiers require a rigid annual subscription commitment.
Yes, Wrike has a permanent Free plan with basic features like Board and Table views. The Trello Free plan is often more robust, allowing up to 10 boards per Workspace. Wrike is typically optimized for scaling enterprises.
Wrike is worth the cost if you need advanced features Trello lacks natively. This includes Resource Planning, deep analytics, and dedicated file proofing. Trello is cheaper but trades off complexity and high-end functionality.
Trello focuses mainly on the Kanban board, with extra views locked behind Premium. Wrike offers native Gantt Charts, Tables, and Calendars, allowing superior project oversight. Wrike offers more viewing flexibility across plans.
Wrike offers superior custom automation and data syncing via Wrike Integrate. Trello relies on community Power-Ups and simpler no-code rules. Wrike supports much higher volumes of integrated automation actions per user.
Wrike is significantly stronger for creative teams. Wrike has built-in proofing for video and 30+ file formats with guest approval capabilities. Trello requires a clumsy manual process or relying on external tools.
Beide Tools haben Stärken. Wähle passend zu deinem Bedarf.