Earn2Trade vs FTMO

Earn2Trade uses a recurring monthly subscription model for access to evaluation programs. The specific monthly cost for Earn2Trade is not publicly stated in the data. You must pay this fee every 30 days to continue trading the evaluation account. FTMO charges a one-time refundable entry fee that begins around €89. If you pass the evaluation successfully, FTMO fully refunds this entire initial fee. Failure means you lose the fee but can attempt another challenge. FTMO’s structure financially rewards success by fully refunding the entry cost. Earn2Trade’s pricing is essentially a paid monthly rental fee until funded status is reached. The FTMO model removes the financial barrier entirely for successful, disciplined traders.

Earn2Trade operates on a monthly billing cycle, suggesting implied time constraints for evaluation completion. The fastest Earn2Trade path, The Gauntlet Mini, allows only 10 days for evaluation. FTMO provides maximum flexibility by ensuring an indefinite trading period for both evaluation steps. There is absolutely no time limit to hit the targets. FTMO significantly reduces psychological pressure often associated with passing prop firm challenges quickly. Traders can wait for the perfect market conditions. Earn2Trade caters better to intraday traders who are ready to prove their skills immediately, often within the tight 10-day window.

Earn2Trade strictly limits trading to Futures products listed on specific exchanges like CME and CBOT. This ensures a specialized trading path within a regulated ecosystem. FTMO is primarily known within the Forex community, though the provided data does not list explicit market restrictions besides those inherent to prop firms. If you are an experienced futures specialist, Earn2Trade provides a laser focus on your asset class. You won't be distracted by other instruments. FTMO is likely more suitable for traders who utilize a broader range of financial instruments in their strategies.

Earn2Trade’s Trader Career Path (TCP) is built for serious growth. This structured path is designed to scale funding up to a large $400,000 account size. FTMO’s successfully passing traders gain access to an FTMO Account with fictitious funds up to $200,000. This is the top capital amount listed. The Earn2Trade TCP offers the highest potential capital management opportunity available between the two firms. This appeals to growth-focused professionals. The $200,000 cap offered by FTMO is still significant and impressive for a proprietary account.

FTMO states clearly that successful traders can receive up to 90% of the simulated profits generated. This is a very generous and transparent share. Earn2Trade confirms that funded traders withdraw their profits, but the specific percentage split is not provided in the evaluation data. For maximizing retained simulated earnings, FTMO provides a transparent and high incentive structure. The 90% split is industry-leading. While Earn2Trade allows profit withdrawal, the lack of a published percentage makes comparison difficult on this metric.

Earn2Trade provides advanced journaling assistance via the third-party tool, journalytix. This helps reinforce strict risk management adherence. This is helpful for objective trade tracking. FTMO unlocks its own proprietary, in-house developed Tools & Services immediately upon purchase of the Challenge. Tools like FTMO MetriX track performance expertly. Both platforms recognize the need for strong data and discipline tracking for success. They approach it via different software delivery methods. Earn2Trade’s use of journalytix connects traders to a dedicated, specialized external analysis platform.