Ahrefs vs SEOcrawl

Ahrefs relies on the world's #1 SEO crawler to index billions of keywords globally. This index provides deep link and competitor data independent of Google. SEOcrawl's core value is maximizing GSC data utility. It gives superior visualization and analysis for your website's existing traffic. If you need deep backlink profiles and market research, Ahrefs leverages far superior, proprietary data.

SEOcrawl completely eliminates the frustrating standard GSC 1,000-row export limit. This is crucial for high-traffic sites needing complete, reliable data retention. Ahrefs offers deep historical data, up to five years on upper tiers. However, Ahrefs enforces restrictive usage limits, charging expensive pay-as-you-go credits for overages. The limit removal feature in SEOcrawl is a massive time-saver for large-scale reporting tasks. You will not hit frustrating export caps with SEOcrawl.

Ahrefs Site Explorer is essential for checking competitor websites and revealing their PPC strategies. You can benchmark ad performance and find all ranking keywords easily. SEOcrawl focuses intensely on your internal GSC performance data. It does not provide third-party competitive intelligence or proprietary backlink analyses. If competitor research is vital, Ahrefs is the mandatory choice due to its proprietary index depth.

Ahrefs users frequently complain the UX is outdated, confusing, and hinders basic functions. Many feel the interface looks like it is 20 years old and needs modernization. SEOcrawl is praised for its simple control panel and excellent data visualization. It transforms complex GSC metrics into clear, actionable business intelligence efficiently. SEOcrawl will allow non-developers to understand performance data much faster than Ahrefs.

Ahrefs uses AI to accelerate content production with tools like the AI Content Helper and Grader. Ahrefs also monitors brand sentiment across the emerging landscape of AI chatbots and LLMs. SEOcrawl’s automation is limited to eliminating manual reporting and rank tracking tasks. It lacks any content creation assistance or brand monitoring features. Choose Ahrefs if AI-driven content is part of your marketing strategy.

Ahrefs reports a quick median first response time of six minutes and a high 90% satisfaction rating. SEOcrawl's limited user reviews document concerning reports of unresponsive or non-existent support staff. Users also alleged serious issues, including sudden downgrades and plan removals, citing lack of trust. For reliability and established support infrastructure, Ahrefs holds a significant advantage. The negative sentiment around SEOcrawl support is a major concern.

Ahrefs maxes out at 50 projects on the top Advanced plan, restricting high-scale agency use. SEOcrawl’s Next Level plan supports managing up to 200 projects simultaneously. The SEOcrawl Enterprise plan handles 100 projects and includes customization features for agencies. If you manage a large client portfolio, SEOcrawl offers much higher native project limits than Ahrefs.

Ahrefs offers monthly flexibility starting from $129 and a free Webmaster Tools plan. However, Ahrefs is expensive and uses a restrictive, usage-based PAYG credit system. SEOcrawl requires a mandatory annual commitment starting at €792 per year. This high upfront cost and risk are significant drawbacks. Although Ahrefs has costly add-ons, its basic entry points are more flexible than SEOcrawl’s annual-only model.