These two platforms tackle project management very differently. Asana is built for powerful internal scaling and centralized workflows. Teamwork focuses intensely on resource planning and project profitability. It’s the difference between enterprise alignment and agency efficiency.
Harika özellikler, zayıf müşteri desteği.
Asana'nın küçük ekipler için uygun güçlü proje yönetimi özellikleri, mükemmel organizasyonel ölçeklenebilirlik ve cömert bir ücretsiz plan sunduğunu düşünüyoruz. Ancak, harici raporlarda yinelenen müşteri hizmetleri yanıt verme hızı ve faturalandırma şeffaflığı sorunları, ürünün temel güçlü yönlerini önemli ölçüde gölgeliyor. Genel olarak, güvenilir, doğrudan müşteri desteğine öncelik veren küçük işletmeler veya herhangi bir kuruluş için dikkatli olmayı tavsiye ediyoruz.
Güçlü özellikler ve sinir bozucu iş uygulamaları.
Profesyonel hizmetler için derin kârlılık takibi ve kaynak tahmini ihtiyacı olan, sağlam, birleşik proje ve kaynak yönetimi araçları sunan Teamwork'ü bulduk. Genel olarak, yazılımın güçlü özellik seti, daha düşük katmanlardaki kafa karıştırıcı, şeffaf olmayan yükseltme yolları ve son derece kısıtlayıcı özellik limitleri nedeniyle ne yazık ki zayıflıyor.
Asana, ekip çalışmanızı, projelerinizi ve görevlerinizi yönetmek için özel olarak oluşturulmuş çevrimiçi bir platformdur. Güçlü İnsan + Yapay Zeka iş birliğini destekler.
Bu yapay zeka bileşeni, en önemli işlerinizi verimli bir şekilde ilerletmenize yardımcı olmak için belirli iş bağlamınızı anlar. Merkezi bir ekosistem olduğu için, tüm yapanları ve paydaşları tek bir yerde kolayca bir araya getirir. 💡
Teamwork.com, müşteri odaklı ve yapay zeka destekli bir proje ve kaynak yönetim yazılımıdır. Geleneksel proje araçlarının ötesine geçerek kaynak tahmini, maliyet kontrolü ve kârlılık raporlaması gibi temel işlevleri tek bir platformda birleştirir.
Bu platforma dünya çapında birçok profesyonel hizmet işletmesi güvenmektedir. Bunlar arasında ajanslar, danışmanlık firmaları, IT hizmet sağlayıcıları ve muhasebe ekipleri bulunur. Teamwork, onların kaynakları verimli bir şekilde zamanlamasına, faturalandırılabilir saatleri yönetmesine ve proje kârlılığını baştan sona takip etmesine yardımcı olur. ✅
Ana farkları vurguluyoruz ve her özellik için bir kazanan seçiyoruz.
Teamwork provides more detailed resource planning for billable teams.
Asana’s resource management visualizes staffing and team capacity. It helps leaders allocate resources across unlimited project portfolios. Teamwork excels with the Workload Resource Planner and utilization reports. This tool optimizes workload distribution and prevents staff overbooking.
Teamwork is built to track project costs and overall profitability.
Asana focuses on task management and requires third-party tools for budgets. It integrates highly with analytical tools like Tableau and Power BI. Teamwork includes native budgeting, cost control, and financial tracking. Scale plan users get comprehensive profitability reports built right in.
Asana AI Studio offers deeper contextual AI features for workflows.
The Asana AI Studio manages routine work using full business context. It handles repetitive tasks and aids faster achievement of crucial goals. Teamwork AI provides project management assistance starting on the Free plan. Teamwork AI supports smarter decision-making and reduces overall busywork.
Asana allows unlimited automation rules on paid plans, Teamwork limits them.
Asana allows users on Starter and above to utilize unlimited automation rules. Standardization and acceleration of key workflows are easily scalable. Teamwork severely limits automation actions, even on paid plans. The Grow plan caps users at 20,000 monthly automation actions, forcing upgrades.
Asana's Free plan serves double the users compared to the Teamwork Free plan.
Asana's Personal plan supports up to 10 users with unlimited projects. It’s perfect for small professional teams starting project management. Teamwork’s Free plan limits usage to 5 users and only 5 total projects. Teamwork's free tier offers built-in time tracking, which Asana lacks initially.
Asana is designed for Fortune 100 scale; Teamwork focuses on client firms.
Asana offers Enterprise+ features like HIPAA and SIEM integration support. It’s trusted by large corporations for organizational alignment and governance. Teamwork’s enterprise focus is complex resource scheduling and high-volume agencies. Their Scale plan requires consultation for advanced security like SSO (add-on).
Both platforms receive heavy criticism for their customer service quality.
Asana users report non-existent support, chatbots, and slow email response times. Mishandled billing and denied refunds are major, recurring complaints. Teamwork support seems limited, possibly reflecting UK business hours only. Teamwork also has reports of very high charges ($500) to export data history.
Asana connects to 300+ tools; Teamwork integrates specific financial tools.
Asana boasts integrations with over 300 enterprise tools out of the box. Connectors include major systems like Salesforce, Tableau, and Power BI. Teamwork prioritizes agency systems like Quickbooks, Harvest, and HubSpot. Teamwork supports one-click migration from tools like Asana and Trello.
Choosing between Asana and Teamwork depends entirely on your primary goal. If you need to align thousands of employees across strategic goals, Asana is the clear winner for organizational scale. Asana handles complex dependencies and connections between daily work and executive objectives. Asana's superpower is its enterprise-ready scalability, advanced AI studio, and superior automation engine. The generous free plan and unlimited automation on paid plans offer fantastic value for large internal teams. However, be aware of the widely criticized customer service and billing practices at Asana. Teamwork’s superpower is its deep focus on profitability and resource efficiency for client-facing teams. Teamwork embeds resource forecasting and cost control right into the management process. This ensures maximum efficiency and clearly tracks billable hours from the start. The critical deciding factor is whether you sell time or manage processes. If every project needs detailed financial tracking and resource utilization reports, Teamwork is unmatched. If you need robust organizational control, advanced compliance, and seamless multi-department coordination, stick with Asana. Ultimately, pick Teamwork if you are an agency managing client budgets and billable hours. Select Asana if you are a scaling business focused purely on internal execution, goal tracking, and needing world-class automation and AI capabilities.
Asana offers a much more generous free Personal plan supporting up to 10 users. Teamwork’s Free plan is limited to 5 users and 5 projects. Therefore, Asana provides better scalability for small teams and startups.
Teamwork offers superb native budgeting tools and profitability reports on higher tiers. It tightly integrates financial tracking with project delivery, unlike Asana. It integrates directly with tools like Quickbooks for streamlined workflows.
Yes, Asana offers unlimited automation rules on its paid tiers. Teamwork severely caps the monthly automation actions, even on its popular Grow plan (20,000 actions). Asana is better for high-volume automated workflows.
Teamwork is superior for capacity planning, offering Workload Resource Planner and utilization reports. Asana uses resource management for overall staffing visualization. Teamwork is optimized for preventing overbooking billable employees.
Neither platform excels here, but Teamwork has a slightly better overall review rating. Asana faces widespread criticism for extremely slow, absent support and aggressive auto-renewal issues. Be prepared for self-service with both options.
Asana offers HIPAA compliance support through its top Enterprise+ tier. Teamwork does not publicly advertise or provide specific compliance features like HIPAA. Asana is the only choice here for highly regulated industries.
Her iki aracın da güçlü yönleri var. Özel ihtiyaçlarınıza göre seçin.