Mullvad and OpenVPN serve vastly different masters despite being VPNs. Mullvad is the king of personal anonymity and simple flat-rate payment structures. OpenVPN provides complex, enterprise-grade Zero Trust solutions for large organizations. The choice comes down to personal privacy simplicity versus corporate compliance control.
고정된 윤리적 가격 책정으로 타의 추종을 불허하는 개인 정보 보호
우리는 Mullvad의 급진적인 투명성과 윤리적인 가격 책정 구조를 높이 평가하며, 이는 엄격하게 개인 정보 보호에 중점을 둔 VPN의 표준을 제시합니다. 전반적으로 이 서비스는 필수적이지 않은 스트리밍 액세스보다 보안을 최우선으로 생각하는 안목 있는 사용자를 위해 탁월한 속도와 진정한 익명성을 제공합니다.
규정 준수를 위해 구축된 유연한 보안 솔루션.
OpenVPN은 제로 트러스트 액세스를 위한 강력한 기반을 제공하며, HIPAA 및 SOC 2와 같은 엄격한 규정 준수를 충족하는 유연한 배포 옵션과 강력한 보안 제어 기능을 갖추고 있습니다. 전반적으로 이는 비즈니스에 경제적인 기능이 풍부한 솔루션이지만, 보고된 기능 신뢰성 및 성능 지연 문제와 비교하여 규정 준수 초점을 고려해야 합니다.
Mullvad VPN은 자유롭고 개방적인 인터넷을 위해 싸우는 데 중점을 둔 개인 정보 보호 서비스입니다. 그들은 사람들이 프라이버시를 누릴 권리가 있을 때 사회가 개선된다고 강력하게 믿습니다. 이 서비스는 대규모 감시 및 검열을 방지하기 위해 노력합니다. 신뢰할 수 있는 VPN을 사용하면 온라인 행동이 상품으로 취급되지 않도록 할 수 있습니다. Mullvad VPN은 디지털 자유와 개인 정보를 안정적으로 확보할 수 있는 확실한 방법을 찾는 모든 사람에게 적합합니다. 💡
OpenVPN은 소규모, 중견 및 대기업을 위해 맞춤화된 안전한 네트워킹 솔루션을 제공하는 신뢰할 수 있는 공급업체입니다. 이 솔루션은 업계 최고의 비즈니스 VPN으로 인정받고 있으며, 2만 개 이상의 조직에서 특히 신뢰하고 있습니다. 이 널리 사용되는 솔루션은 민감한 데이터를 위한 보호되고 암호화된 터널을 제공합니다. 사용자가 불안정한 공용 네트워크를 통과할 때에도 장치가 비즈니스 자산에 안전하게 연결되도록 보장합니다. 핵심 제품은 고성능, 신속 배포 제로 트러스트 VPN 솔루션입니다. 💡
주요 차이점을 강조하고 각 기능에 대한 승자를 선택합니다.
Mullvad offers true anonymity right from signup; OpenVPN requires identity for per-seat business access.
Mullvad requires only a unique account number to connect. Mullvad actively avoids gathering personal data like emails or phone numbers. OpenVPN uses a per-seat model tied directly to a user's identity. OpenVPN enforces security policies based on identity, device, and IP verification. Mullvad sets the benchmark for genuine privacy seekers. OpenVPN adheres strictly to corporate access control requirements.
OpenVPN addresses strict rules like HIPAA and SOC 2; Mullvad is solely focused on personal anonymity.
OpenVPN is engineered to meet strict regulatory standards like HIPAA and GDPR. OpenVPN provides enterprise-grade security controls necessary for regulated businesses. Mullvad prioritizes evading surveillance and general anonymity above all else. Mullvad's structure avoids linking user identity, making corporate compliance impossible. If compliance is mandatory, OpenVPN is the necessary choice.
Mullvad is flat-rate and hyper-stable; OpenVPN is complex, scalable, and per-seat based.
Mullvad’s price has been fixed at €5 per month since 2009. Mullvad offers consistency and maximum payment flexibility with no contracts. OpenVPN’s CloudConnexa starts at $11/seat/month, typically billed annually. OpenVPN uses volume discounts and is designed for scaling headcount up or down dynamically. Mullvad is cheaper, predictable, and better for the individual budget.
OpenVPN implements ZTNA with IDS/IPS and access controls; Mullvad offers only a basic VPN tunnel.
OpenVPN provides CloudConnexa with advanced features like IDS/IPS and content filtering. OpenVPN enforces the principle of least privilege access organization-wide. Mullvad focuses on hiding your IP address from outside trackers. Mullvad offers security but lacks the detailed controls needed for internal network segmentation. OpenVPN is crucial for granular corporate security needs.
Mullvad accepts cash and crypto for anonymity; OpenVPN strictly uses standard business billing methods.
Mullvad’s unique acceptance of physical cash ensures maximum purchase anonymity. Mullvad offers a 10% discount for payments made using cryptocurrencies like Monero. OpenVPN primarily uses standard per-seat billing and annual contracts for discounting. OpenVPN’s payment methods are designed for business accounting needs, not user privacy. This highlights Mullvad's commitment to user privacy.
Mullvad is praised for excellent speeds; OpenVPN is widely criticized for platform lag and poor UX.
Mullvad users report blazing fast speeds and low latency using WireGuard protocols. Mullvad’s reliable performance makes it suitable for everyday heavy use and gaming. OpenVPN users report serious issues with browser authentication complexity and extreme lag. OpenVPN’s reported performance issues contradict its promised reliability. Mullvad delivers superior speed and stability according to users.
OpenVPN offers self-hosted Access Server or managed CloudConnexa; Mullvad is solely a consumer managed service.
OpenVPN can be deployed via Access Server on Docker, Linux, or VMware ESXi for full architectural control. OpenVPN’s CloudConnexa offers simpler, managed cloud connectivity for mobile teams. Mullvad users simply download the dedicated app and enter their account number. Mullvad works instantly but gives the user zero control over server deployment. OpenVPN provides IT teams flexibility in deployment choices.
OpenVPN provides generous free plans forever; Mullvad offers only a limited 14-day money-back guarantee.
OpenVPN offers the CloudConnexa Free plan for up to three seats indefinitely. OpenVPN also allows two free concurrent connections on the self-hosted Access Server. Mullvad offers no free plan, instead providing a simple 14-day money-back guarantee. OpenVPN is better for teams seeking long-term, functional testing at zero cost.
Mullvad and OpenVPN target wildly different markets, so the choice is simpler than you think. Mullvad dominates for individual privacy; OpenVPN is built exclusively for corporate security. Unless you run a regulated business, Mullvad wins hands-down for general users. Mullvad’s superpower is radical transparency and remarkable pricing stability since 2009. Mullvad guarantees true anonymity by requiring only an account number, not your email or name. You can even pay Mullvad with physical cash to separate money from identity. It delivers excellent speeds and performance for everyday use. OpenVPN’s superpower is its enterprise-grade security and stringent regulatory compliance capabilities. OpenVPN helps management implement Zero Trust policies and meets requirements like HIPAA and GDPR. OpenVPN offers deployment flexibility with managed CloudConnexa or self-hosted Access Server options. The deciding factor boils down to control versus anonymity. If your business needs centralized user access control and compliance, OpenVPN is your necessary choice. If you want a simple, blisteringly fast service that ensures your identity remains private, Mullvad is consistently better. For most consumers, Mullvad provides unbeatable privacy value at €5 per month.
OpenVPN is better suited for small teams because it offers a Free plan for up to three seats. OpenVPN also allows centralized access control and features the flexibility to scale as your business grows. Mullvad is capped at 5 devices and lacks business compliance features needed for teams.
No. OpenVPN is explicitly built to support ZTNA, enforcing least privilege access based on identity and device. Mullvad is a straightforward VPN designed for personal anonymity. Mullvad lacks the necessary internal network controls like content filtering or IDS/IPS provided by OpenVPN.
You should choose Mullvad if streaming is a priority, but be aware that its IPs are often blocked by services. OpenVPN is a B2B product not designed or marketed for personal streaming. Mullvad, while inconsistent, is the only choice marketed toward consumer use cases.
Mullvad famously charges a flat €5 per month regardless of subscription length. OpenVPN uses a per-seat subscription model with automatic volume discounts. OpenVPN pricing starts with a Free plan and includes paid seats starting at $11 per user monthly.
OpenVPN has universal client support across operating systems, despite user complaints about lag. Mullvad users frequently report a poor, sometimes complicated experience with mobile devices. For ease of mobile connectivity, OpenVPN may be slightly better equipped, even with performance issues.
No. Mullvad is the gold standard for anonymity, asking only for a temporary account number and accepting cash payments. OpenVPN requires linking identity to seats and uses standard billing necessary for corporate management. OpenVPN must track users for compliance; Mullvad refuses to track users for privacy.
두 도구 모두 강점이 있습니다. 특정 요구 사항에 따라 선택하세요.