Backlog by Nulab Inc and IFTTT solve very different problems. Backlog is for project management and code tracking, while IFTTT automates connections between apps. Your choice depends on whether you need a team workspace or a personal automation engine.
Best for: Software development teams needing integrated Git/SVN, Project managers running sprints and tracking issues
Best for: Individuals wanting to automate personal app workflows, Smart home enthusiasts connecting devices and services
Solid all-in-one for dev teams.
Overall, we find Backlog to be a capable and cost-effective platform that effectively merges project management, issue tracking, and code collaboration into a single tool. It's a strong choice for small to mid-sized teams looking to simplify their workflow without per-user costs.
Conectividad masiva, pero rendimiento poco fiable.
Reconocemos la fortaleza técnica de IFTTT al conectar un catálogo masivo de servicios, ofreciendo un potencial de automatización potente tanto para usuarios domésticos como de negocios. Sin embargo, informes significativos de usuarios indican que la fiabilidad ha disminuido sustancialmente mientras que la estructura de precios se ha vuelto demasiado agresiva. En general, encontramos que el alto costo y el rendimiento impredecible hacen que sea difícil confiar en él para automatizaciones de misión crítica.
Backlog is an all-in-one work management platform built for teams that build, plan, or create. 🚀 It combines project management, issue tracking, and team collaboration into a single, powerful tool. This makes it ideal for development teams managing code and bugs, design teams planning sprints, marketing teams running campaigns, and small businesses seeking a straightforward solution without user limits.
IFTTT es la plataforma líder sin código diseñada para una potente automatización tanto en tu vida empresarial como doméstica. Ofrece una forma sencilla de conectar más de 900 servicios diferentes, incluyendo herramientas como Google Calendar, Spotify y YouTube, usando simples Applets. Puedes automatizar desde cualquier lugar y en cualquier momento, gracias a las aplicaciones dedicadas para iOS y Android, asegurando una productividad continua. Está construida sobre una comunidad masiva de más de 27 millones de usuarios y más de 900 marcas que ya usan la plataforma. 💡
Destacamos las principales diferencias y elegimos un ganador para cada característica.
Backlog is a connected workspace for teams. IFTTT is a no-code automation glue for apps.
Backlog by Nulab Inc combines project management, issue tracking, and team collaboration into one hub. It's built for teams that build or create together. It includes native Git/SVN repositories, so developers can link code commits directly to tasks. IFTTT is a platform for creating automations between apps using 'Applets'. It connects over 900 services like Google Calendar, Spotify, and smart home devices. The goal is to make your existing apps work together automatically. The key difference is focus. Backlog by Nulab Inc centralizes team work and assets. IFTTT connects disparate apps to automate simple, repetitive tasks.
Backlog automates team workflows. IFTTT automates cross-app actions.
Backlog by Nulab Inc focuses on automating project workflows. Its AI Assistant can help create summaries and daily to-do lists. Automation is tied to your project tasks and team processes. IFTTT's entire purpose is automation via Applets. A free user gets 2 Applets. Paid plans offer more, up to unlimited on Pro+. You can create multi-action Applets where one trigger starts several steps. Backlog by Nulab Inc automates within its own ecosystem. IFTTT automates between hundreds of external services. If you need to connect Twitter to Google Sheets, IFTTT is built for that.
Backlog is built for team collaboration. IFTTT has limited team features.
Backlog by Nulab Inc is designed for teams. It offers task assignment, comments, file sharing, and sprint planning. Teams of 10, 50, or more can collaborate on shared projects. Flat pricing means adding members doesn't increase costs. IFTTT is primarily a single-user or household tool. While teams can use it, it lacks built-in features for task delegation, progress tracking, or team discussions. It's about connecting services, not managing team work. For any real team collaboration, Backlog by Nulab Inc is the clear choice. IFTTT doesn't compete in this space.
Backlog integrates with key business tools. IFTTT connects a massive service library.
Backlog by Nulab Inc integrates with essential business and dev tools. This includes Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, and Dropbox. It also offers a robust API for custom integrations. The focus is on core productivity tools. IFTTT boasts an ecosystem of over 900 services. This includes everything from social media and productivity apps to smart home devices like Philips Hue. The breadth is its main selling point. Backlog by Nulab Inc integrates with the tools your team already uses. IFTTT integrates with almost any app or service you can think of, especially for personal automation.
Backlog uses flat, predictable team pricing. IFTTT charges per user for feature tiers.
Backlog by Nulab Inc offers a free plan for 10 users. Paid plans are flat fees, like $35/month for 30 users. This means you can grow your team without your subscription cost increasing per person. It's budget-friendly for scaling. IFTTT's free plan is limited to 2 Applets. Pro is $2.99/month, Pro+ is $8.99/month. These prices are per user. To get advanced features like filter code or unlimited Applets, you pay more per user. Backlog by Nulab Inc's model rewards team growth. IFTTT's model can become expensive if many individuals in an organization need advanced automation features.
Backlog aims for steady project management. IFTTT faces reliability criticism.
Backlog by Nulab Inc is presented as a stable platform for critical project work. User reviews mention it's reliable for daily stand-ups and sprint planning. Issues with support response times were noted. IFTTT reviews are filled with complaints about reliability. Users report Applets failing or experiencing severe delays of several hours. This is a major pain point for those relying on its automation. For mission-critical project tracking, Backlog by Nulab Inc appears more dependable. IFTTT's automation reliability is a significant concern based on user feedback.
Both offer mobile apps for on-the-go access.
Backlog by Nulab Inc provides a mobile app for managing tasks and projects from your phone. Users find it handy for quick checks and updates while away from their desk. IFTTT also has dedicated iOS and Android apps. These allow you to manage and trigger your automations from anywhere, ensuring productivity continues on the move. Both tools offer a functional mobile app for their core purpose. This is a tie, as both meet the need for mobile access effectively.
Backlog by Nulab Inc pricing: Backlog by Nulab Inc offers a range of flat-fee plans starting from a free tier up to $175 per month, with no per-user fees. You can save 17% by choosing annual billing for any paid plan level reached by your team's needs. Plans range: $0–$210/month Billing options: Free plan, Free trial, Monthly subscription, Yearly subscription, Per seat pricing, Usage-based pricing

IFTTT cuesta entre $0.00 y $107.88 al año con tres planes: IFTTT Free a $0.00, IFTTT Pro a $35.88/año y IFTTT Pro+ a $107.88/año.
Exploremos en detalle las tres opciones de plan disponibles para encontrar la cantidad adecuada de automatización para tus necesidades.
Precio: $0.00 / para siempre Sitios web compatibles: N/A - Plataforma de automatización Ideal para: Empezar con la automatización Política de reembolso: No indicada explícitamente Otras funciones:
We found that external review platforms like Trustpilot were not accessible due to verification errors, preventing us from gathering specific user sentiment from those sources. Capterra was not provided.
Therefore, our review is based solely on the official product information and pricing details from Nulab. ✅ We can confirm Backlog offers a unified platform for project management, issue tracking, and collaboration with built-in Git/SVN support and no per-user fees.
Backlog is great for keeping all our code and tasks in one place. The Git integration is seamless, and my team stopped switching between five different apps. It just works for our sprint planning.
La opinión externa sobre IFTTT muestra una imagen de extrema insatisfacción del usuario, especialmente entre los clientes de toda la vida que experimentaron la plataforma antes de las importantes reformas de precios. La fiabilidad es una cuestión central; muchos usuarios informan que los Applets son muy poco fiables, sufriendo fallos o retrasos severos, a veces de hasta varias horas.
La queja más frecuente se centra en el cambio hacia un modelo comercial agresivo. Los usuarios se sienten engañados por la reducción frecuente y sustancial del límite del plan gratuito de Applets, que ha bajado a solo dos, empujándolos innecesariamente hacia niveles de pago que consideran demasiado caros.
Este servicio podría ser genial, pero lamentablemente es muy poco fiable ahora. No activa los disparadores correctamente, y el retraso sigue aumentando hasta el punto en que tarda varias horas en ejecutarse. Necesitamos automatización estable, no retrasos.
This isn't a close call. Backlog by Nulab Inc and IFTTT serve fundamentally different needs. Choosing between them is about defining your problem. Backlog by Nulab Inc's superpower is being a unified team workspace. It excels at managing software projects, design sprints, and marketing campaigns in one place. With built-in Git and no per-user fees, it's built for collaborative creation. IFTTT's superpower is its massive connectivity. It's the king of making disparate apps talk to each other. Need your smart lights to react to a calendar event? IFTTT has an applet for that. The deciding factor is collaboration vs. automation. If you manage a team and need shared project visibility, Backlog by Nulab Inc is your tool. If you're an individual automating tasks between apps, IFTTT is the answer. For most teams, Backlog by Nulab Inc is the clear winner. Choose IFTTT only if your core need is personal app automation, and even then, be wary of its reliability issues. For team project management, Backlog by Nulab Inc is the smarter, more reliable investment.
Backlog by Nulab Inc is designed for small teams with its flat-fee pricing. IFTTT can be used by teams but lacks collaborative features. Its per-user cost can add up quickly for group use.
Not in the same way. Backlog by Nulab Inc automates project workflows internally. For connecting hundreds of external apps like Google Sheets or Twitter, IFTTT is the specialized platform.
It depends entirely on your need. If you need app automation, IFTTT Pro may be worth it. If you need team project management, Backlog's free plan is far more valuable.
Backlog by Nulab Inc's free plan has 10 users; paid plans scale to unlimited. IFTTT's free plan is for one user with 2 Applets. IFTTT's paid plans are per user, so limits are based on your subscription tier.
Backlog by Nulab Inc receives positive feedback for daily project management. IFTTT reviews are filled with complaints about Applet failures and severe delays, harming its reliability.
Yes, both Backlog by Nulab Inc and IFTTT offer dedicated mobile apps for iOS and Android. They let you manage projects or automations from your phone.
Ambas herramientas tienen sus fortalezas. Elige según tus necesidades específicas.